Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sauzet [2019/12/26 09:48] adrian [2009] |
sauzet [2020/01/12 02:35] rayner.cheung [2008] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 359: | Line 359: | ||
| * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019): not oxidized, taught, mineral, austere, super (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019): not oxidized, taught, mineral, austere, super (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| * **Puligny Combettes** (May 2019): after the Referts & Perrieres. Another odd bottle, the darkest colour (just) of the 3. No obvious pox, but just tatses of caramel, flat, no fruit or minerality or lift. Very advanced - certainly way below par (again)? (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Combettes** (May 2019): after the Referts & Perrieres. Another odd bottle, the darkest colour (just) of the 3. No obvious pox, but just tatses of caramel, flat, no fruit or minerality or lift. Very advanced - certainly way below par (again)? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| - | * **Puligny Combettes** (June 2019): 3rd time lucky & quite a difference, tight, dense, very citrus, youngish (Adrian Latimer) | + | * **Puligny Combettes** (June 2019): 3rd time lucky & quite a difference, tight, dense, very citrus, youngish (Adrian Latimer) |
| + | |||
| ===== 2009 ===== | ===== 2009 ===== | ||
| Line 365: | Line 366: | ||
| * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | ||
| * **Puligny Referts** (May,Dec 2019) 1st no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good, 2nd in December nice aromatics, similar but finish completely flat and dead, drinkable but advanced. If 1st bottle would score 91-2 this would be 90... (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Referts** (May,Dec 2019) 1st no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good, 2nd in December nice aromatics, similar but finish completely flat and dead, drinkable but advanced. If 1st bottle would score 91-2 this would be 90... (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| - | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer) | + | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July, Dec 2019) no premox, that makes 6 ten year old 1e crus drunk this year, one a bit tired but none premoxed and 5 on very good form. Glimmer of optimism?! (Adrian Latimer) |
| * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2019) again no premox, not too 09 ripe, lovely (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2019) again no premox, not too 09 ripe, lovely (Adrian Latimer) | ||