Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sauzet [2021/05/06 13:52] rayner.cheung [2008] |
sauzet [2021/05/06 13:54] rayner.cheung [2008] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 349: | Line 349: | ||
| * **Chevalier Montrachet** (July 2016): Excellent, appropriately pale [RBE_NZ] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (July 2016): Excellent, appropriately pale [RBE_NZ] | ||
| * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Sept 2020): Not oxidised [Jammy Wine] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Sept 2020): Not oxidised [Jammy Wine] | ||
| - | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (May 2021): Not oxidized. Pale yellow gold. Classic Sauzet + Classic 2008 white Burgundy. Citrus & citrus blossom in the nose. Plenty of bracing acidity on the palate, but the underlying richness of the fruit is not to be underestimated. Purchased in 7/15 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (May 2021): Not oxidized. Pale yellow gold. Riveting: this is classic Sauzet & classic 2008 white Burgundy. Citrus & citrus blossom in the nose. Plenty of bracing acidity on the palate, but the underlying richness of the fruit is not to be underestimated. Purchased in 7/15 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Puligny Garenne** (Apr 2012): not oxidized, youthful. [Joe Durnell] | * **Puligny Garenne** (Apr 2012): not oxidized, youthful. [Joe Durnell] | ||
| * **Puligny Champ-Canet** (May 2013): not oxidized, youthful and fresh [droch] | * **Puligny Champ-Canet** (May 2013): not oxidized, youthful and fresh [droch] | ||