Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sauzet [2019/07/21 20:07]
rayner.cheung
sauzet [2019/09/02 11:40] (current)
adrian [2009]
Line 311: Line 311:
   * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer)   * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer]   * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer]
-  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 6 btls not oxidized. ​Not decanted. Quite massive, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 6 btls not oxidized. ​Better ​decanted. Quite monolithic, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"​** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"​** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
Line 365: Line 365:
   * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry]   * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry]
   * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer)   * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer)
 +
  • sauzet.1563732463.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2019/07/21 20:07
  • by rayner.cheung