Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sauzet [2019/07/27 09:06]
adrian [2009]
sauzet [2019/11/09 00:37] (current)
rayner.cheung [2006]
Line 311: Line 311:
   * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer)   * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer]   * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer]
-  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): btls not oxidized. Better decanted. Quite monolithic, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – Nov. 2019): btls not oxidized. Better decanted. Quite monolithic, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"​** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"​** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
Line 366: Line 366:
   * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer)   * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer)   * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer)
-  * **Puligny Garenne** (July 2019) very nice (Adrian Latimer)+  * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer)
  
  • sauzet.1564211181.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2019/07/27 09:06
  • by adrian