Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
domaine_leflaive [2022/05/07 02:53]
rayner.cheung [2010]
domaine_leflaive [2022/06/19 23:41]
rayner.cheung [2010]
Line 595: Line 595:
   * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger]   * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger]
   * **Batard Montrachet** (Feb 2014); no oxidation and very young[TSim@rud]   * **Batard Montrachet** (Feb 2014); no oxidation and very young[TSim@rud]
 +  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Nov. 2021 – Jun. 2022): ​ 1 btl borderline oxidized + 1 btl fine. The good btl was pale to medium gold, with a floral nose complicated by mineralité. On the palate, a taste of dried peaches, citrus peel, & minerals. Similar in style to the 2005, but less sweet & less powerful. 13% ABV. From a lot of 2 purchased in May 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud]   * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]
Line 602: Line 603:
   * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud]   * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud]
   * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Sept 2020): Oxidised [Jammy Wine]   * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Sept 2020): Oxidised [Jammy Wine]
-  * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Pucelles"​** (May 2021 – ): btls not oxidized + 1 btl amber gold in color, but the aromatics & flavors were quite fine. Powdered lemon & lime candy, stone, & a little musk in the nose. More citrus on the palate, together with peach pit & lemondrops. A very different style of Pucelles compared with something even as recent as the 2007 (which exhibited a more diverse range of fruit elements – see above), but this may reflect the vintage more than any change in winemaking approach, since comparable wines at comparable domaines are also exhibiting this citrus–heavy character. From a lot of 6 purchased in Aug. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Pucelles"​** (May 2021 – Jun. 2022): btls not oxidized + 1 btl amber gold in color, but the aromatics & flavors were quite fine. Powdered lemon & lime candy, stone, & a little musk in the nose. More citrus on the palate, together with peach pit & lemondrops. A very different style of Pucelles compared with something even as recent as the 2007 (which exhibited a more diverse range of fruit elements – see above), but this may reflect the vintage more than any change in winemaking approach, since comparable wines at comparable domaines are also exhibiting this citrus–heavy character. From a lot of 6 purchased in Aug. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   ​   ​
 \\  \\ 
  • domaine_leflaive.txt
  • Last modified: 2022/10/30 02:03
  • by rayner.cheung