Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
ramonet [2020/05/21 11:35] jammywine |
ramonet [2023/11/05 06:20] (current) rayner.cheung [2002] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
| * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(July 2007): no signs of oxidation, nice wine [ER] | * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(July 2007): no signs of oxidation, nice wine [ER] | ||
| * **Chassagne Ruchottes** (23 Dec 2010): premoxed [Philip Robert] | * **Chassagne Ruchottes** (23 Dec 2010): premoxed [Philip Robert] | ||
| + | * **Chassagne Les Caillerets** (Nov 2019): No premox but lean and slightly funky. [Jammy Wine] | ||
| ===== 1995 ===== | ===== 1995 ===== | ||
| Line 327: | Line 328: | ||
| * **Montrachet**(August 2009): Not oxidised [WK Choy] | * **Montrachet**(August 2009): Not oxidised [WK Choy] | ||
| * **Montrachet**(4 Mar 2010): Not oxidized but excessively minty on the palate. Hope this bottle is an aberration. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Three [Don Cornwell] | * **Montrachet**(4 Mar 2010): Not oxidized but excessively minty on the palate. Hope this bottle is an aberration. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Three [Don Cornwell] | ||
| + | * **Montrachet** (Nov. 2023): Dark gold. Nose very ripe. Less advanced on the palate, saved by the wine's firm acid spine. Got better with air. Served by a generous & close friend & fellow collector with impeccable sourcing. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
| * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (Dec 2007) not oxidized. cork appears unbleached [David Klinger] | * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (Dec 2007) not oxidized. cork appears unbleached [David Klinger] | ||
| * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2013): Not oxidised and drinking very well | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2013): Not oxidised and drinking very well | ||