Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
colin_philippe [2018/03/14 12:41] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
colin_philippe [2022/07/17 21:42] (current) rayner.cheung [2010] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * **Chevalier Montrachet **(May 2011): not oxidised, excellent wine [Stephane Pierrel] | * **Chevalier Montrachet **(May 2011): not oxidised, excellent wine [Stephane Pierrel] | ||
| * **Chassagne Montrachet Les Chenevottes** (Jan 2012) completely oxidised [Stephen Dreher] | * **Chassagne Montrachet Les Chenevottes** (Jan 2012) completely oxidised [Stephen Dreher] | ||
| - | \\ **2006**\\ | + | |
| + | ===== 2006 ===== | ||
| * **St Aubin Les Combes** (Dec 2012): no oxidation and really freakin good. [Andrew Rose] | * **St Aubin Les Combes** (Dec 2012): no oxidation and really freakin good. [Andrew Rose] | ||
| - | \\ \\ **2008**\\ | + | |
| + | ===== 2008 ===== | ||
| * **Puligny Montrachet Demoiselles **(Oct 2012): no sign of oxidiation but very ready to drink now -- perhaps too ready. Excellent in any case [MLT] | * **Puligny Montrachet Demoiselles **(Oct 2012): no sign of oxidiation but very ready to drink now -- perhaps too ready. Excellent in any case [MLT] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 2010 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jan. 2021 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. Needs decanting. Still incredibly primary in the nose & on the palate, with lots of bracing citric mineralité. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Jul. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] | ||